![]() ![]() The only reason it isn’t considered one is because science rejects religion or any divine knowledge…… despite the fact its concrete findings are built on what are still considered to be unexplainable forces of our universe. (The sociological question of “If a tree falls in the forest, can it make a sound if you aren’t there to listen?” reflects this quite well.) ![]() My perspective? Perhaps, but science is also about perspective. Saying astrology is a science is not simply my opinion. The primary example of a discipline that is ridiculed and undermined- astrology. Load and behold, the handy dandy scientific method-designed to minimize all possible biases-has become a bias itself used to justify science as holier than thou. This wealth of knowledge became a package deal with a heightened sense of arrogance and pretentiousness from the scientific community. You know what’s hilariously ironic to me? As the globe experienced the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution back in the 18th century, we’ve accumulated a large wealth of scientific knowledge allowing us to advance in unfathomable ways.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |